ISSN: 2706-8862
Volume 10, Number 5 (2025)
Year Launched: 2016
Journal Menu
■ About The Journal
■ Aims & Scope
■ Editorial Board
■ Article Processing Charge
■ Archive

Topos Many-Node Theory: Roots, Foundations and Predictions

Volume 10, Issue 5, October 2025     |     PP. 198-246      |     PDF (1475 K)    |     Pub. Date: November 4, 2025
DOI: 10.54647/physics140700    13 Downloads     315 Views  

Author(s)

Hamidreza Simchi, Department of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran 16844, Iran

Abstract
Among the various existing theories, we show how the concept of the space-time network has entered the physics of quantum gravity by reviewing the theories of loop quantum gravity and causal sets. Assuming that the first creatures of creation create a network, it is shown that how the network can be mapped to a topos discrete quantum manifold which has been equipped with both the discrete calculus and the Alexandrov’s algebra. We assign a locale to each nodes of the space-time network and shown that in general, invariance under Lorentz transformations is no longer true. it is shown that the cosmological constant is non-zero and can be proportional to the second power of the Hubble radius. By considering a population (set), including newly born timid children and non-timid children who survive until the birth of the new network, it is shown that the entropy of the space-time network is quantized and increases as the network grows. In consequence the inflation of the world is expected phenomenon. Also, we show that how world inflation can be described based on the concept of truth object and truth value belong to the topos theory. Although the temperature and pressure are both high in the early moments of the creation of the world, it is shown that the quanta of vibrations, called netons, can be attributed to the vibration of space-time network, and it is expected that they will be observed in the future experiments related to cosmic background radiation. Finally, it is shown that the root of noncommutative geometry is in attributing the locale to the nodes of the space-time network instead of a point. This theory, which is quantum-relativistic from the beginning, has not the problem of a point particle, the concept of probability is an emergent concept, it does not include the problem of the measurement theory, it is not a universal Lorentz invariant, its cosmological constant is non-zero and it can be proportional to the second power of the Hubble radius, it describes the inflation of the universe and it has a non-commutative geometry, is called the many-node theory.

Keywords
Space-time network, Topos theory, Inflation of universe, Lorentz invariance, Non-commutative geometry

Cite this paper
Hamidreza Simchi, Topos Many-Node Theory: Roots, Foundations and Predictions , SCIREA Journal of Physics. Volume 10, Issue 5, October 2025 | PP. 198-246. 10.54647/physics140700

References

[ 1 ] D. Rickles, S. French, and J. Saatsi, “The structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity” (Oxford University Press, 2006).
[ 2 ] B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
[ 3 ] Abhay Ashtekar, “New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 18, (1986).
[ 4 ] R. Gambini and J. Pullin, “A first Course in Loop Quantum Gravity” (Oxford University Press, 2011).
[ 5 ] Robert M. Wald, “General Relativity” (The University of Chicago Press, 1984).
[ 6 ] Abhay Ashtekar, “New Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D, 36, 6 (1987).
[ 7 ] A. Ashtekar, J. D. Romano, and R. S. Tate, “New variables for gravity: Inclusion of matter”, Phys. Rev. D 40, 8 (1989).
[ 8 ] R. Gambini and A. Trias, “Second quantization of the free electromagnetic field as quantum mechanics in the loop space “, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1380 (1980).
[ 9 ] R. Gambini and A. Trias, “Geometrical origin of gauge theories “, Phys. Rev. D 23, 553 (1981).
[ 10 ] R. Gambini and A. Trias, “Gauge dynamics in the C-representation “, Nuc. Phys. B 278, 436 (1986).
[ 11 ] C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, “Knot Theory and Quantum Gravity “, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1155 (1988).
[ 12 ] R. Giles, “Reconstruction of gauge potentials from Wilson loops”, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2160 (1981).
[ 13 ] R. Gambini and J. Pullin, “Loops, Knots, Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity” (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
[ 14 ] C. Rovelli, “Quantum Garvity” (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
[ 15 ] C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, “Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity” (Cambridge University Press, 2014).
[ 16 ] Hermann Weyl, “Space-Time-Matter” (Dover Publications, Inc. 1950).
[ 17 ] E. C. Zeeman, “Causality Implies the Lorentz Group”, J. Math. Phys. 5, 4 (1964).
[ 18 ] S. W. Hawking, A. R. King, and P. J. McCarthy, “A new topology for curved space-time which incorporates the causal, differential, and conformal structures” J. Math. Phys. 17, 174 (1976).
[ 19 ] J. Myrheim, “Statistical Geometry”, CERN-Geneva Ref.TH.2538-CERN (1978).
[ 20 ] G. ‘t Hooft, “Quantum gravity: a fundamental problem and some radical ideas” (in M. Levy and S. Deser, eds., Recent Developments in Gravitation, Cargese 1978, Plenum 1979).
[ 21 ] Luca Bombelli, “PhD Thesis: Space-Time as a Causal Set” (Syracuse University, 1983).
[ 22 ] L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, and R. D. Sorkin, “Space-Time as a Causal Set”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 5 (1987).
[ 23 ] D. P. Rideout and R. D. Sorkin, “Classical Sequential Growth Dynamics foe Causal Sets”, Phys. Rev. D 61, 024002 (1999).
[ 24 ] Sumati Surya, “The Causal Set Approach to Quantum Gravity” Living Reviews in Relativity 22, 5 (2019).
[ 25 ] Hamidreza Simchi, “Statistical Geometry Representation of Spacetime” (Chapter 8 of A. Mohammed ed. New Frontiers in Physical Science Research Vol.9, B P International, 2023, DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nfpsr/v9/9579F).
[ 26 ] Hamidreza Simchi, “General Formulation of Topos May-Node Theory” (Chapter 7 of A. Mohammed ed. New Frontiers in Physical Science Research Vol.9, B P International, 2023, DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nfpsr/v9/9580F).
[ 27 ] J. Reiterman, V. Rodl, and E. Sinajova, “Geometrical Embedding of Graphs”, Discrete Math. 74, 291 (1989).
[ 28 ] Mikio Nakahara, “Geometry, Topology, and Physics” (Institute of Physics Ltd, 2003).
[ 29 ] A. Dimakis and F. Muller-Hoissen, “Discrete Differential Calculus: Graphs, Topologies, and Gauge Theory”, J. Math. Phys. 35, 6703 (1994).
[ 30 ] A. Dimakis, F. Muller-Hoissen, and F. Vanderseypen, “Discrete Differential Manifolds and Dynamics on Networks”, J. Math. Phys. 36, 3771 (1995).
[ 31 ] L. M. Chen, “Digital and Discrete Geometry” (Springer, 2014).
[ 32 ] T. D. Lee, “Can Time be a Discrete Dynamical Variable?”, Phys. Lett. B 122, 217 (1983).
[ 33 ] C. J. Isham, “An introduction to general topology and quantum topology”, (in Proceedings of the Advanced Summer Institute on Physics, Geometry and Topology, 1989).
[ 34 ] C. J. Isham, “Quantum topology and quantization on the lattice of topologies”, Class. Quantum Grav. 6, 1509 (1989).
[ 35 ] R. D. Sorkin, “Finitary Substitute for Continuous Topology”, Inter. J. Theoretical Phys. 30, 923 (1991).
[ 36 ] A. P. Balachandran, G. Bimonte, E. Ercolessi, and P. T. Sobrinho, “Finite approximations to quantum physics: Quantum points and their bundles”, Nuc. Phys. B 418, 477 (1994).
[ 37 ] Manuel Hohmann, “Quantum Manifold”, AIP Conf. Proce. 1424, 149 (2012) (arXiv:0809.3111 [math-ph])
[ 38 ] Hamidreza Simchi, “The Concept of Time: Causality, Precedence, and Space Time” (Chapter 7 of A. Mohammed ed. New Frontiers in Physical Science Research Vol.9, B P International, 2023, DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nfpsr/v9/9578F).
[ 39 ] Thomas F. Jordan, “Quantum Mechanics in Simple Matrix Form” (John Wiley & Sons, 1936).
[ 40 ] H. S. Green and M. Born, “Matrix Mechanics” (P. Noordhoff LTD, 1965).
[ 41 ] Alexander Komech, “Quantum Mechanics: Genesis and Achievements” (Springer, 2013).
[ 42 ] Steven Weinberg, “The troubles with Quantum Mechanics”, NYREV, Inc. January 19 (2017).
[ 43 ] Lee Smolin, “Trouble with Physics”, (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2006).
[ 44 ] Hugh Everett, “The Theory of the Universal Wave Function”, (PhD Thesis, Princeton. Reprinted in De Witt and Graham, 1973).
[ 45 ] Cecilia Flori, “A First Course in Topos Quantum Theory”, (Springer, 2013).
[ 46 ] Cecilia Flori, “A Second Course in Topos Quantum Theory”, (Springer, 2018).
[ 47 ] Cecilia Flori, “Group Action in Topos Quantum Physics”, arXiv: 1110.1650 [quant-ph].
[ 48 ] Hamidreza Simchi, “A Grand Unified Reaction Platform: Concept of Time Approach” (Chapter 7 of A. Mohammed ed. New Frontiers in Physical Science Research Vol.9, B P International, 2023, DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nfpsr/v9/9570F).
[ 49 ] J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, “The Universe from Scratch”, Contemp. Phys. 47, 103 (2006).
[ 50 ] C. J. Isham and J. Butterfield, “Some possible roles for topos theory in quantum theory and quantum gravity”, Found. Phys. 30, 1707 (2000).
[ 51 ] Sarita Dalya Rosenstock, “A Categorial Consideration of Physical Formalisms” (PhD Thesis, University of California, Irvine, 2019).
[ 52 ] L. M. Gaio and B. F. Rizzuti, “A categorical View on the Principle of Relativity”, arXiv:2205.15408v1 [math-ph].
[ 53 ] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lfshitz, “The Classical Theory of Fields” (Pergamon, Oxford, 1951).
[ 54 ] M. Ahmed, S. Dodelson, Patrick B. Green, and R. Sorkin, “Everpresent Λ”, Phys. Rev. D 69, 103523 (2004).
[ 55 ] Nosiphiwo Zwane, “Cosmological Tests of Causal Set Phenomenology” (PhD Thesis, University of Waterloo, 2017).
[ 56 ] F. Dowker and S. Zalel, “Evolution of Universe in Casual Set Cosmology”, C. R. Physique 18, 246 (2017).
[ 57 ] David P. Rideout, “Dynamics of Causal Sets” (PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1995).
[ 58 ] D. P. Rideout and R. D. Sorkin, “Classical sequential dynamics for causal sets”, Phys. Rev. D 61, 024002 (1999).
[ 59 ] F. Dowker and S. Zalel, “Evolution of universe in causal set cosmology”, Comptes Rendus Physique 18, 3 (2017).
[ 60 ] R. D. Sorkin, “Indication of causal set cosmology”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39, 1731 (2000).
[ 61 ] Djamel Dou, “Causal sets, a possible interpretation for the black hole entropy and related topics” (PhD Thesis, SISSA, Trieste, 1999).
[ 62 ] L. Demetrius, “Natural selection and age-structured populations”, Genetic, 79, 535 (1975).
[ 63 ] C. M. Constantin and A. Doring, “A Topos Theoretic Notion of Entropy”, arXiv:2006.03139v1 [math.CT] (2020).
[ 64 ] J. M. Ziman, “Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids” (Oxford, 1960).
[ 65 ] Shashanka S. Mitra, “Infrared and Raman Spectra Due to Lattice Vibrations” (Chapter 14 of S. Nudelman et al. (eds.), Optical Properties of Solids, Springer Science - Business Media New York 1969).
[ 66 ] B. J. Kim, H. Hong, and M. Y. Choi, “Netons: vibrations of complex networks”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 6329 (2003).
[ 67 ] E. Estrada, N. Hatano, and M. Benzi, “Yhe physics of communicability in complex networks”, Phys. Reports 514, 89 (2012).
[ 68 ] Edward Nelson, “Derivation of the Schrodinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics”, Phys. Rev. 150, 4 (1966).
[ 69 ] Dominic Breit, “Existence Theory for Generalized Newtonian Fluids” (Elsevier, Academic Press, 2017).
[ 70 ] F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin, “Quantum theory from quantum gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124029 (2004).
[ 71 ] J. Bluemer, R. Engel, J.R. Hoerandel, “Cosmic Rays from the Knee to the Highest Energies” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 293 (2009).
[ 72 ] T. Kanazawa, G. Lambiase, G. Vilasi, and A. Yoshioka, “Noncommutative Schwarzchild geometry and generalized uncertainty principle”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 95 (2019).
[ 73 ] J. Madore, S. Schraml, P. Schupp, and J. Wess, “Gauge theory on noncommutative space”, Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 161 (2000).
[ 74 ] Leonard L. Schiff, “Quantum Mechanics” (McGraw-Hill Company, 1968).