SCIREA Journal of Philosophy (ISSN: 2995-7788)

SCIREA Journal of Philosophy is an international, scientific peer-reviewed open access journal published online by SCIREA.

Open Access free for readers, with article processing charges (APC)paid by authors or their institutions.

High visibility: Indexed in the Google Scholar and other databases.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors approximately 20 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 5 days.

Recognition of reviewers: reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any SCIREA journal, in appreciation of the work done.

Recently Published Papers
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: As a topic, fraternity occupies an important position in western philosophy. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Gadamer, etc. have all studied fraternity from different angles. In the history of Western classical thought, friendship is a highly political thing. At the same time, fraternity is also one of the important sources of w
Abstract       References PDF (23947 k) 24 Downloads     891 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720109
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Moral paradox is a special contradiction in the world of moral phenomena, which is a result that appears in behavioral choices and has an absolute opposition and antagonistic nature between good and evil. The manifestation of the opposition between good and evil in the process of appropriate implementation of behavior choic
Abstract       References PDF (25752 k) 10 Downloads     867 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720108
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: In the real society where qualitative culture prevails, people's psychological level is gradually losing their demand for freedom and liberation after being controlled. It seems to be a Utopia to expect some top-down political or economic liberation. In this regard, Marcuse shifted the starting point of liberation from the
Abstract       References PDF (25200 k) 22 Downloads     1108 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720106
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Moral paradox is a difficult problem perplexing logic, which is often difficult to solve in classical logic. Suing many valued logic has become a choice. As a solution to moral paradox, multivalued logic provides a thinking framework of the logic system that is different from the traditional binary logic. It helps us look a
Abstract       References PDF (22926 k) 18 Downloads     899 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720104
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Moral paradox is a kind of unique problems existing in human real life world. It is the different results people make for the same behavior based on different value judgment and value choice intention in some situations. And this result often has the contradictory nature of right and wrong, good and evil, beauty and uglines
Abstract       References PDF (24612 k) 17 Downloads     866 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720103
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: When faced with multiple dilemmas of moral choice, self driving cars often cause moral and legal problems that make people think deeply. When the self driving car is in such an unavoidable dilemma that it is necessary to hit people, it will be a puzzle whether it is utilitarianism to kill one person and save multiple people
Abstract       References PDF (25090 k) 15 Downloads     931 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720102
Open Access
Weikang Zhu
Abstract: Human beings have been paying attention to moral paradox for a long time, especially in recent decades, moral paradox has been highly valued and studied by more and more scholars. Moral paradox, as a special logical contradiction in the real world of human life, is the spiritual product of human practice. Many years' resear
Abstract       References PDF (26397 k) 16 Downloads     900 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720101
Open Access
Zhaolong Yuan, Cheng Zhang
Abstract: This paper first formalizes categorical propositions in syllogisms, then proves the validity of the generalized syllogism MAI-4, and then deduces other 15 valid generalized syllogisms from the syllogism MAI-4. In other words, there are reducible relationships between/among the 16 syllogisms. This study highlights the dialec
Abstract       References PDF (246272 k) 20 Downloads     1275 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720099
Open Access
Igor Janev
Abstract: In the study of the general methodology of science and philosophy, we have discovered a common fundamental problem of the “paradox of the basic element” that creates inconsistencies in social and natural theory and general ontology and epistemology. Our study of the state interactions as a major international actor leads us
Abstract       References PDF (111104 k) 2516 Downloads     22066 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720098
Open Access
Jingyi Zhang, Yijiang Hao
Abstract: This paper formalizes Aristotelian modal syllogism within the framework of knowledge mining and subsequently proves the validity of the Aristotelian modal syllogism ▢EAO-3 through the application of modal logic and generalized quantifier theory. Moreover, by means of the integration of specific rules and facts derived from
Abstract       References PDF (291367 k) 16 Downloads     1717 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720095